Case Study Method — Previous Year Questions
📊 Topic Overview
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Questions | 8 (3.6%) |
| Priority | 🟡 MEDIUM — Section A or B |
🎯 Must-Know Concepts
- Definition of case study method
- Purpose and goals
- Types of case studies (clinical, illustrative, exploratory, critical instance)
- Sources of data in case studies
- Steps in conducting a case study
- Strengths and limitations
📝 Master Answer — Section B (250 words / 6 marks)
Q. Explain the purpose and types of case study method. (6 marks)
Also: "Critically analyze the case study method." (2014-Jun); "Discuss case study method as a study of individual behaviour." (2020-Jun)
Case Study Method
The case study method is an in-depth, comprehensive investigation of a single individual, group, or event. It is an idiographic approach — seeking to understand the particular rather than establish general laws. In personality assessment, it involves collecting data from multiple sources (interviews, psychological tests, personal documents, medical records, observations) to construct a detailed understanding of the individual's personality and behaviour.
Purpose
- Clinical purpose: Formulate diagnosis, plan treatment, monitor progress
- Research purpose: Generate hypotheses, illustrate theoretical concepts, study rare conditions
- Educational purpose: Training therapists through case examples
Types of Case Studies
- Illustrative Case Study: Describes a particular situation or individual to illustrate a concept or theory (e.g., Freud's case studies — Little Hans, Dora)
- Exploratory Case Study: Preliminary investigation into a poorly understood phenomenon to generate hypotheses for further research
- Critical Instance Case Study: Examines a single case that challenges or confirms a theoretical assumption
- Clinical/In-depth Case Study: Comprehensive study for diagnosis and treatment planning — the most common type in clinical practice
Strengths
- Rich, holistic data; captures complexity of individual functioning
- Useful when experimental methods are impractical or unethical
- Generates hypotheses for quantitative research
Limitations
- Cannot generalise findings to other individuals
- Prone to researcher bias and selective interpretation
- No control over variables; cannot establish causal relationships
- Time-consuming and resource-intensive
💡 Exam Tips
- Always list 4 types with examples — this is the most frequently tested component.
- "Critically analyze" questions require balanced coverage of both strengths and limitations.
- Freud's case studies (Little Hans, Dora, Schreber) are classic examples — mentioning them earns marks.